Do these Bluttos believe the penalties were missed on purpose, no, any excuse to vent their spleen it would seem
I've read that the graffiti was not racist but it referred to his footballing skills, if so why is it considered 'racially aggrevated'? Surely the fuzz couldn't be exaggerating the seriousness of the act.
Police are now saying that the graffiti was not of a racial nature, they're 'keeping an open mind' as their investigations continue, only took four days to reveal something that must have been blaring obvious, just enough for the Britain haters to fill the media with more negativity and rent a mob to get down on their pathetic knees to this nonsense.