Health Ombudsman accuses Countess of Chester hospital of cover-up.

[celeste]

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2023-08-23/nhs-ombudsman-accuses-hospital-of-cover-up-over-serial-killer-lucy-letby              video


Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Rob Behrens spoke to ITV Granada Reports presenters Lucy Meacock and Andy Bonner
The Countess of Chester has been accused of a cover-up after numerous consultants raised concerns about serial killer nurse Lucy Letby[/size][/size] before she was caught.

Rob Behrens, the NHS Ombudsman, published a letter written to the Health Secretary asking for a wider review into the culture and leadership in the NHS.
It follows concerns some paediatricians were made to apologise to Letby after raising concerns about her with senior managers.
Mr Behrens says this amounted to a "cover-up" at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

'The culture of fear is not isolated': Calls for change in NHS following Letby  He said: “Clearly that is what happened, on this occasion the deaths were intentional. That happens very exceptionally.

“We know from the evidence in court that for two years, clinicians were raising patent safety issues about the baby unit and they were not listened to.
"They were forced to apologise for the distress they caused her. It is a cover-up, it prevented an investigation by the police for two years after it could have begun."

[Parky]

When Letbey was called to a meeting with senior staff after she complained about being accused she took her parents with her ,what grown woman does that ,Union rep yes but mam and dad ? ,

[celeste]

Witnesses?   

[ExileSteve]

Well, at long last this (possible) wrongful conviction is receiving public attention again, thanks to The New Yorker being brave enough to publish and be damned in the face of strong threats and intimidation from the usual suspects. I have long believed that a retrial, at the least, is essential in this case; there are so many questions about the conviction of Lucy Letby, and the attempt by the Establishment to suppress publication of this story tells us a great deal that we need to know.


Birmingham Six, anyone? Guildford Four?

[ExileSteve]

Oh well, at least I can admit to being wrong. After plenty of digging, and upon closer inspection of the "evidence" presented by Science On Trial in the light of this story sitting in the public spotlight once again, it turns out that some of us have been taken for a ride. The qualifications of the two individuals behind this organisation turn out to be bogus and it is clear that they have falsified significant parts of the case they have presented; in particular, their claims about subsequent deaths and injuries continuing after Lucy Letby's suspension and eventual arrest have turned out to be false. The only claim made by Science On Trial that is unquestionably genuine is that Letby's conviction was based upon circumstantial evidence only, and that forensics and witnesses were absent from the prosecution's presentation.


If there is ever to be an appeal on her behalf it is safe to say that her barrister will not trouble himself too much with SOT and their unsubstantiated claims. They have about as much credibility as Neil Ferguson or Anthony Fauci. 😒